Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘APICS’

About twenty years ago American manufacturers began changing the face of the supply chain when they began “offshoring” — moving production to cheaper sources in foreign nations, expanding a national supply chain into a global one.  Fast forward 15 years or so, and a fair portion of that production has been seen returning home once again due largely to quality issues, but also to the increasing cost of much of that foreign manufacturing, once things like travel, shipping, duty fees, vendor due diligence, theft and piracy and a host of other issues are factored in.

Today, the opportunities and challenges afforded by 3D printing are beginning to create still another new form of “reshoring” that is poised to challenge everything we know about manufacturing.  Since its first patent was issued over 30 years ago, 3D printing is quickly becoming ubiquitous.  Its capabilities are now way beyond the prototype state, and the variety of materials that can be used has grown exponentially, notes John Collins, an APICS CFPIM, and Erick Jack dean of the Collat School of Business in a recent article for APICS Magazine.

Then there’s the recent article in The Economist (“A Third Industrial Revolution”), noting that the digitization of manufacturing is as significant as the mechanization of the textile industry and the introduction of mass production in the automotive sector.  “The ability to produce smaller batches of items tailored to specific customer needs at significantly lower costs could make the factory of the future look more like the weaver’s cottage than Ford’s assembly line.”  And that’s not to mention what this development implies for the changing skill sets of today factory workers as design and programming grow in emphasis.

Some are predicting that global logistics efforts will be reduced as manufacturers shift more of the capabilities and production back to their home shores to take advantage of customer and market proximity.  According to the PLS Logistics Blog, “part of the supply chain will become superfluous.”

When you think about, it makes sense if manufacturers can deliver small batches of customized products and prototypes.  It makes for leaner inventories, for one.  It increases the ability to respond more quickly to customer requests.  Manufacturers may be able to respond to orders directly from factories, thus eliminating some distribution elements.  Locations of stock might be consolidated, and transportation routes are likely to contract as smaller manufacturing locations provide more local 3D printing.

Collins and Jack ask whether it “might even be possible that 3D printing will supersede the concepts of nearshoring and reshoring.  After all,” they state, “where a manufacturing facility is located won’t matter much if customers can ‘deliver’ the products they purchase at home via a personal 3D printer.”

The supply chain of manufacturing has long been all about “speed, cost, quality and flexibility.”  3D printing provides both challenges and opportunities in all these.  Creating ways to incorporate new technologies like 3D printing into our processes provides plenty of both – including the opportunity to be an innovator while remaining competitive in a changing supply chain landscape.

Read Full Post »

APICS (The American Production and Inventory Control Society, “the premier professional association for supply chain management”) provides a wealth of information both practical and theoretical about how companies (especially manufacturers and distributors, but applicable beyond) can manage for results and continuously improve their operations through lean initiatives and supply chain excellence.

In the Mar/Apr issue of their magazine, in an article entitled “Targeting Continuous Improvement with Laser Focus,” APICS member Iris Nielsen points out four factors essential to successful continuous improvement which “when implemented properly, can help professionals reach near-perfect results:”

  1. The support of an organization’s executive team. Arguably the number one requirement.  Executives need to demonstrate support for the initiative and model behaviors they want employees to emulate.
  2. The time and mental capacity required must be present and available. Too often, companies work harder instead of smarter.  Problems in need of fixing are often a series of small failures that distract teams from identifying root causes of the real issue at hand.  Be aware of those who cut corners or cause chaos, as you search out root causes.
  3. Constancy of purpose. This was the first of W. Edwards Deming’s 14 key principles for significantly improving business effectiveness.  It relates to an unwavering focus on improvement, which is critical to maintaining and sustaining forward momentum.  Progress here is not so much an initiative as “a long-term practice that permeates the core of the organization.”
  4. Consider the long-lasting effects of the work. Sometimes managers get so focused on monthly or quarterly targets that it “becomes counterintuitive to prioritize improvements” that don’t have an immediate impact.  But continuous improvement is as much a mind-set as it is about action.  Sometimes you have to take a step backwards in order to take two steps forward.

Remember too, Nielsen adds, to celebrate the “tiny triumphs.”  They lie at the heart of continuous improvement, and their celebration will incentivize the types of forward momentum that will keep your own improvement initiatives on track.

Clearly communicate expectations, design processes to meet customer needs and “give them what they value.”  While perfection may never be achieved, striving for it is key.  Know what to look for, what to adjust or fix, and when to act when a process is not creating the optimal product or service.  Only then, notes Nielsen, will real innovation be realized.

 

 

Read Full Post »

As we began in our prior post to look at a new technology called “blockchain,” we posed the question: What if you could document and preserve all the data associated with a product’s life cycle from the origin of the raw materials to the final sale of the finished good as it travels along the supply chain, with 100% certainty?

In today’s concluding post, we start with a supply chain counterpoint: Even if you could, is it worth it?

An analyst at Aberdeen Group, Bryan Hall, is quoted in a recent article in the Mar/Apr 2017 issue of APICS Magazine pointing out that supply chains are full of unexpected events and disruptions, ranging from damaged goods to carrier capacity issues, not to mention customs delays, clogged ports, theft and other issues.  The key to adjusting and correcting often lies in what Hall calls the “occasional heroics” that keep plans on track – and none of these actions are possible without visibility.

According to Aberdeen, fewer than 60% of companies had online visibility into in-transit shipment status.  The percentages were even lower for visibility into data to make decisions, or to view supplier quality and manufacturing processes – in other words, traceability.

Other studies have generally confirmed that most companies lack full visibility into their supply chains, and most experience supply chain disruptions periodically.  Often, the source is not even analyzed, and all come at a cost.

And as Business Insider reports, according to APICS, the growth of IoT (Internet of Things – i.e., internet connected devices and machines) will generate yet more massive amounts of data.  Writes Crandall, “Blockchains have the potential to provide security and accountability that traditional databases don’t.”

As examples he cites IBM using a blockchain in the diamond industry… PwC using blockchain to deliver on-stop solution for financial service firms… Wal-Mart testing blockchain’s abilities to track the flow of certain food items to quickly identify items that may be tainted and subject to recall.  The downstream implications of that one – the ability to possibly prevent foodborne illnesses which cause 3,000 people per year and hospitalize more than 100,000 – quickly become clear.

TechCrunch contributor Ben Dickson has written of how blockchains will “enable companies to register information about a product transfer and the product’s price, location, quality and any other information that is relevant to managing it.”

And by its very nature, a public blockchain will ensure that all users have equal and common visibility into everyone’s supply chain.  The decentralized and open nature of blockchains inherently restricts withholding or manipulating information to gain advantage, while built-in encryption will help to ensure data integrity.

In the end, blockchains in the supply chain will eventually assure better regulation compliance, product integrity, customer satisfaction and confidence in product knowledge and movement for the entire family of producers, distributors and consumers.  According to APICS, The World Economic Forum has said that 10 percent of all global domestic product will be stored in a blockchain by 2025.

While still in its infancy, this new technology will present supply chain professionals with both opportunities and challenges.  But as noted business guru Peter Drucker observed long ago, the best executives focus on opportunities, not problems.

 

In our next post, we’ll take one final look (for now) at the newest wrinkle in blockchain, called Ethereum.  A lot of very big companies are getting on board with it as you’ll see.  We’ll tell you more in our very next post.  Stay tuned…

 

Read Full Post »

What if you could document and preserve all the data associated with a product’s life cycle from the origin of the raw materials to the final sale of the finished good as it travels along the supply chain, with 100% certainty?

That could be a reality in the not too distant future, thanks to a fast-growing technology we’ve written about several times here before, called “blockchain.”  We thought today we’d take you through a few of the basics of this important new technology, which you’ll be hearing more about in the future.

Some of our source material here comes from APICS and APICS Magazine (Mar/Arp 2017 issue, and others), and other publications.  APICS is an organization devoted to improving the skills of supply chain professionals everywhere through teaching and training in principles of supply chain excellence.  We are a long-time supporter of the organization and its efforts, and recommend their programs often to our clients.  As disclaimer, we are in no way affiliated with APICS other than as longstanding members, benefiting over the years from their training programs, most notably the CPIM (Certified in Production and Inventory Management) certification program.  PSSI also holds multiple “Company of the Year” award designations from our local chapter.  Learn more about the local chapter here.

Blockchain is basically a ledger system built on a peer-to-peer network (think: database) used to record and track transactions on computers.  The first blockchain was developed by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 and was implemented in 2009 as a ledger for a new kind of currency called “bitcoin.”

One of block chain’s appealing characteristics is that it does not require a “central authority” or a trusted third party, such as a bank.  Instead, a blockchain relies on three components: a transaction, a record of that transaction, and a system that verifies and stores the record.  Once stored, it is said to be difficult (though as the remedy to a recent Ethereum blockchain hack has demonstrated, not necessarily impossible) to delete.

According to an APICS Magazine article by Dr. Richard Crandall of Appalachian State University (referencing an article in The Economist in 2015), blockchain has “… a mixture of mechanical subtlety and computational brute force built into its ‘consensus mechanism,’ the process by which the parties involved agree on how to update the blockchain to reflect the transfer of [records or] bitcoins from one person to another.”

When someone wants to add to a blockchain, the other participants run an algorithm to evaluate and verify the proposed transaction.  If approved (a process too complex to describe here), the new transaction is added to the blockchain.  Or, in the case of the bitcoin currency, a new coin is added.

Marc Andreessen, a highly successful venture capitalist and inventor of the first popular web browser, Mosaic, describes the importance: “The practical consequence is that for the first time… one internet user can transfer a unique piece of digital property to another [that] is guaranteed safe and secure, everyone knows that the transfer has taken place, and nobody can challenge the legitimacy of the transfer.  The consequences of this breakthrough are hard to overstate.”

Ultimately, say blockchain advocates, if chains can be used to transfer and track bitcoins, companies can use blockchains as public ledgers to track product attributes including ingredients and history of production.

And that will usher in the next generation of supply chain innovation.  We’ll take a look at some of the implication of blockchains on supply chains in our concluding post next.  Stay tuned…

 

Read Full Post »

Recently, in an article for APICS Magazine, Jonathan Thatcher, director of research for APICS (an organization long dedicated to supply chain operational excellence), listed a few tips for companies challenged by an ever-increasing number of SKUs (stock-keeping units, or inventory items) they are required to manage.  We thought we’d reprise a few key highlights here today.

Thatcher recommends starting at the top of the cycle: by developing greater “systemic visibility” in your organization using hard numbers and data to support a “systems concept,” which the APICS dictionary defines as “an attempt to create the most efficient complete system as opposed to the most efficient individual parts.”

To begin with then, you must identify the flow of many individual components while also reviewing the performance of the overall supply chain.  Each new SKU increases cost and complexity to the entire system.  As these costs grow, it gets harder to maintain an accurate “cause-and-effect vision” of expense and value for the entire system.  “Even if a new SKU does deliver some new net value,” he writes, “is it enough to profitably pay for the cost of the increasingly complex stocking options?”

Next, he advises, talk to your customers to figure out where to draw the line for SKU proliferation.  Ask them to identify the point where more SKUs become a burden instead of an asset.  This can help determine a potential SKU limit.

To gain executive support for your SKU reduction endeavor, Thatcher says you then need to explain a few things:

  • SKU innovation may be at war with Pareto’s 80/20 law that states that 20% of inventory items make up 80% of inventory value.
  • The right number of SKUs likely reflects the amount of variation and complexity sought by your customers.
  • The wrong number of SKUs squeezes resources and can divert them away from the products that deserve them.
  • Realize that it’s a complicated and often nuanced topic that requires ongoing, shared management effort to overcome these complexity costs.

And finally, Thatcher suggests, “develop a policy prohibiting a net increase in SKUs.  As new ones appear, retire old and low value SKUs to make room.”  Just be sure that these efforts form a part of your overall supply chain strategy that prioritizes innovation, customers service levels and reduced costs.

Read Full Post »

We like highlighting and learning from stories about companies getting “lean” because helping manufacturing and distribution companies become more competitive through lean processes supported by good software is exactly where we live.

A recent article in the Mar/Apr issue of APICS Magazine about a lean transformation of an Agilent Technologies spinoff called Keysight Technologies highlights the efforts of that firm to transform its supply chain into a more responsive, flexible and efficient one.  The goal was nothing less than to adopt a “holistic approach to develop a comprehensive lean transformation strategy.”

We found a few key takeaways from APICS Magazine’s review of Keysight’s challenges, most notably what they called the three key pillars of their lean transformation.  It’s worth noting by the way that Keysight earned the 2016 APICS Corporate Award of Excellence in Innovation as a result of its lean transformation.  Those three key pillars:

  1. Develop Competency: Ensure all employees across all sites are well equipped with the necessary lean competencies.
  2. Deliver Value: Use lean methodologies to achieve breakthrough results in the areas of cost savings, lead-time reduction and customer satisfaction.
  3. Sustain a lean culture: To derive long-term value from the lean initiative, foster ongoing improvements through a shift in mind-set and the adoption of lean throughout the organization.

While the full article is too lengthy to detail here, we believe that the points above and the anecdote that follows provide some good “thinking points” as you consider your own lean initiatives.  Quoting directly from the APICS article…

“To achieve world-class manufacturing at Keysight, a program was launched that encompasses cycle-time, inventory reduction, greater efficiency and enhanced flexibility.  Entire product lines were scanned in order to identify stock keeping units that had high inventories and were not meeting customer-requested lead times.  These items were then examined based on revenue and cause-codes, and constraints and bottlenecks were identified.  Innovative solutions were implemented one by one to break the constraints.  For example, the component-washing process at Keysight had been a cycle time issue because the activity was shared among many different product lines and could only be conducted in batches.  However, contract manufacturers did not face such constraints, so component washing was moved to that site.”

We cite the above only to illustrate the style of lean thinking, and the measured steps, that we’ve found over time lead to the virtuous cycle of continuous improvement.  Redesigning work centers, optimizing vertical spaces and assembly motion, and implementing other modular concepts are among other efficiency improvements brought about through lean thinking.

Want to hear more?  You can learn more about APICS locally here.  Want to learn more about how to lean out your operation?  At the risk of being commercial here, as we always like to say: We’re here to help!  Contact us (reply to this post).

Read Full Post »

cycle-countIn our prior article we discussed the method behind inventory cycle counting as a way to improve your company’s inventory accuracy.  There we briefly touched upon the most common cycle counting method, known as the “ABC” method.

But it’s worth noting that these cycle counts can be performed in several different ways, depending on things like location preferences or special criteria, as we are reminded in the Sep/Oct 2016 issue of APICS Magazine.  We’ll offer some of their other cycle counting method examples here today:

  1. The Zone Method: Particularly good for items with fixed locations. The count schedule starts with the first location in a zone and continues daily until the last location is reached.  Then, the count begins again at the first location.
  2. The Location-Audit Method: Best used when items are stored randomly. Here, a set number of locations is counted and their inventory counts are validated each day.
  3. The Special-Counts Method: Items are selected to be counted based on criteria such as negative or zero balances, shipment or receipt of items, fill shortages, etc.

These methods are among those suggested by David F. Ross in his article for APICS Magazine entitled Cycle Counting by the Probabilities, in the Sep/Oct 2016 issue now available to APICS members.

Inventory is one of the costliest items a business possesses.  We present this information as a service to our many manufacturing and distribution ERP clients because we know that inventory cost saved is ROI regained.  We’re happy to help others with inventory dilemmas, and are strong believers in the principles espoused by APICS in helping to improve our clients’ inventory and production capabilities, methods, profitability and overall success.

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »