Posts Tagged ‘RFID’

RFIDIn an APICS Magazine article entitled “RFID at Work” three PhD’s who serve day jobs as computer professors and consultants detail many of the requirements for implementing Radio Frequency ID systems in manufacturing.  While you can find the full article (if you’re an APICS member) in the Sep/Oct 2015 issue, we thought we’d reprise for our readers here the key steps to implementation.  What follows assumes that you’ve already parsed through the thought process about whether RFID is right for you when it comes to having more accurate and timely information to improve your business processes.

The basic element of any RFID system is the data point – the location where the RFID ‘tag’ is read.  It can be used to receive goods and follow work in process along its route according to the ERP system, tracking progress across all work centers or locations.

The key initial step then is simply to identify the key issues and goals of the system, and follow those with a set of design principles.  Look for the logical and technical process requirements that must be logged or acted upon, as well any constraints.  From these, a prototype can be implemented.

In a typical manufacturing environment, the tag will contain fields including the order number, the finished good ID or product number and the route step identifiers that establish the sequence of work center operations.

Most low-cost tags have relatively limited memory (512 bits), minimal enough at these price points that it requires that the data is produced while moving the tag from one station to the next in the route while interactively obtaining deeper data from a traveler, route ticket or work order already in the ERP system.

Each work center is monitored by data readers with antenna(s) mounted above the shop floor.  Typically, the reader will read any RFID tag that comes within about a ten foot radius of itself.

In such a setting, data points would be equipped with touch screen monitors displaying WIP tags in the queue.  At the exit point from production, a tag bearing the product ID number is attached to the product before being moved to inventory, shipping or secondary operation areas.  The tag is read at this point and that information can be transferred back into the ERP system, thus completing the loop.

The info provided above is intended of course only as a general outline of RFID.  A system requires all the “layers” to work together in order to make the tracking of goods more efficient.  Those layers include the physical RFID network consisting of tags, antennas, readers, touch screens, and the shop floor network.  The second layer is usually the ‘middleware,’ responsible for producing your tag ID numbers, reading and writing to the tags, and managing data transfer from data point to reader and then to the network’s control system.  The point is: there is a fair amount of work involved, as one might expect.

Hopefully, our comments here today, courtesy of our friends at APICS, will get you started in your thinking down the road to RFID.

Read Full Post »

dms_keeping_WPIn this final post (derived in part from a white paper from Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions that can be found here), we’ll provide a few key takeaways when considering barcode data collection in your own firm, and take a quick look at payback.

Common points to look for payback when implementing barcode technology include:

  • Shipping & receiving
  • Time entry
  • Part or Item picking
  • Inventory counting
  • Invoicing
  • Production labor input tracking

Each company needs to look at the high cost of inaccurate data, and consider which areas are most ripe for improvement through process automation.  Look for where data entry is required, determine the significance of that function, and then look for how automation will improve the accuracy or speed of that process.

What is the cost of the solution?  Many out-of-the-box solutions to enable data collection are relatively inexpensive.  Sometimes, as our example showed in our prior post, the entire system cost can be recouped in a single annual inventory replacement.  Generally, you’ll find modest investment and rapid payback.

When evaluating payback, look at the obvious tradeoffs: system implementation costs versus the positive benefits of such things as:

  • Reduced picking errors
  • Reduced inventory levels
  • Reduced carrying costs
  • Reduced data entry errors
  • Reduced inventory counts/expense
  • Reduced shipping errors (when you ship the wrong item and fail to ship the right one!)
  • Improved on-time delivery
  • Reduced out-of-stock situations

… and the list goes on.

Given the benefits, most data collection systems can have a payback horizon as little as 6 months to a year.  That doesn’t even include the intangible benefits of improved goodwill, customer retention, employee satisfaction and brand image.

In short, most firms that employ barcode technology intelligently – with a good plan and some forethought – find it both a short-term and a long-term money maker.  Start with a conversation and some guidance from your technology or ERP provider.  If they’ve done this for awhile, they will have no problem taking it from there.


Read Full Post »

dms_keeping_WPIn this series of posts we’ve been illuminating some key points of interest for companies interested in improving their business with technologies like barcode and RFID for data collection and inventory tracking purposes.  Our inspiration comes from a white paper from our friends at Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions (DMS), a provider of add-on products for Microsoft Dynamics NAV software users.  That white paper can be found here in its entirety.

Our 4th of 5 posts today covers an example of benefits derived from these technologies in inventory management, as described by DMS at one of its client firms.

This was a company with thousands of items (SKUs) and which conducted annual inventory counts manually.  As you can imagine, inventory counts were a major event at this firm, as DMS points out.  To avoid business disruption, counts usually occurred over a weekend, for which employees were paid overtime.  Prep work began ten days before the actual counts, including the entire prior weekend.  After the counts, it took four staff five days to reconcile all the numbers.

When the company decided to employ a 2-D barcode-based system for product and inventory bins and to utilize handheld readers to receive inventory, put away items and pick product for shipments, improvements rapidly followed.  They were able to carry out small, more frequent, easier counts.  They reduced the number of inventory adjustments required.  Faster cycle counts improved accuracy, which in turn improved order fill rates.  Customer satisfaction rose with improved quoting of delivery dates.  Counting only the reduction in inventory labor, the firm reported that the entire barcode system paid for itself after the very first annual count.

Our own deployment of these types of inventory and WMS automation solutions bears out similar success stories over the years.

Besides improving virtually all facets of a company’s inventory concerns, barcode technology has also been found useful in data collection during production (counters that tally production, or count lengths of material used during extrusion processes).  They’ve also been used to track the labor component in product assembly, and can be integrated with timekeeping systems for payroll purposes as well as improved job cost tracking – ultimately yielding more accurate actual time tracking that in turns leads to better future job quoting.

The results are almost always improved productivity, the result of using fewer people (or less time) to accomplish more production, more accurately, or to reduce the overhead costs of some previously manual, often inaccurate tracking chore.  Not to mention, reduced rework, improved accuracy, better quoting and improved on time delivery.  The end result when properly implemented is almost always twofold: improved customer satisfaction coupled with lowered costs.

And finally… the time to recapture barcode inventory investments represents one of the fastest recapture rates in all of automation today.  We’ll take a quick look at that in our next and final post on the data collection/barcoding topic.  Stay tuned…


Read Full Post »

dms_keeping_WPIn our prior post we looked at the basics of RFID as a possible tool in data (or inventory) management as applies to a shop floor environment.  Given the pros and cons of RFID (the cons mostly falling into the cost category), let’s turn our attention to barcoding technology next.

Again, we’re borrowing from our friends at DMS whose white paper on the subject is found here.

In terms of cost (as in low), complexity (as in simple) and universal acceptance (in manufacturing, it really is everywhere)… you can’t beat barcode technology.  More varieties (2-D, 3-D) are becoming available, and they’ve long been available in a number of different (usually industry-driven) “symbologies.”  Increasingly too, more and more data can be packed onto a barcode label.

In addition, most ERP systems have at least some form or rudimentary barcode capability or recognition built in, or at least, easily integrated.  As well, there are many available hardware and software options, thus keeping costs manageable.  This extends to handhelds as well which, while not “cheap” are certainly cost effective, and pack a lot of technology into a small and efficient footprint.

Barcodes can come in the form of labels, stamps, tags, Teflon-coated (dirt-resistant), large format (for higher shelves, say) and small format (in-line scanning), polyester tags, high-temperature resistant tags, and more.  Newer technologies involving data matrix layouts permit more data to be stored in the tag than ever before.

So… when it comes down it, which do you choose, RFID or barcode?

A number of studies have been conducted on the topic, and one out of the Univ. of Western England concluded “… while RFID can deliver improved operational performance over traditional barcode systems, it is found to be less reliable in implementation.”  Studies have found that while processing times with RFID can be quicker, they were less consistent, and that RFID produced higher error rates.  And given RFID’s higher costs and technology requirements, barcode still appears to be, as the DMS white paper describes it, “the most practical and accessible way to automate warehouse and industrial processes.”

While both technologies have seen gains since the study, barcode remains the “ubiquitous international standard for product tracking.”

As DMS notes, regardless of what technology you choose, the benefits can be very significant in key areas like:

  • Rejection and rework
  • Processing times
  • Entry errors
  • Manufacturing costs
  • Sales per employee

In our next post, we’ll take a look at the benefits of using barcode in inventory management.

Finally, we’ll conclude in our final post in this 5-part series with some thoughts on practical matters like where to barcode, and expected payback periods.  Stay tuned…


Read Full Post »

dms_keeping_WPWe’re picking up from our intro, last post, to talk today about data collection systems…  Our post is based on some sound points made by our friends at DMS in a white paper found here.

Even companies with electronic data management systems still record a lot of physical transactions on paper.  Sometimes it’s almost unavoidable.  Handwritten receipts… parts issued to jobs… shop floor travelers… vouchers… shipping documents, etc.  Eventually, most of these need to be translated into the firm’s electronic realm.   Too often, however, the document is lost, or delayed when found, or improperly recorded (typos, number errors, etc.).

There is a cascading effect to this.  When a picker pulls something from inventory improperly or without recording it, the system’s inventory levels will show more stock than is physically there.  Even once the problem is recognized, it typically involves pulling someone away from their regular job and correcting the mistake.  Productivity is reduced if this happens often, with a corresponding effect on margins.  And if the problem is not recognized, the results can be worse: unfulfilled production or customer promises, bad delivery quotes, expedited shipments, and so on.

It’s been said that a 10% degradation in on-time delivery results in a 1% market share loss.

The point is: recording transactions on paper is a highly volatile and potentially destructive practice.  In most cases we find the effects are actually far worse – once they’re actually measured – than clients ever know.  In other words, the damage is even worse than you probably expected.

Here’s where our friends at DMS make a key point, and where the introduction of data collection (barcode and RFID technologies) begins to come into play.  First, break your processes down to the simplest, most common sense components.  “Applying lean principles to a paper system ensures that, prior to implementing an electronic solution, your processes are completely streamlined.”   Capture your data at the point of physical transaction.  It’s the first step to reducing delays and lost information.  After that, it’s time to look into automating the collection process.

Two key technologies exist in the shop floor data management arena: RFID and Barcode.  We’ll take a brief look at RFID first.

RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology uses small “tags” that contain unique information that describe whatever it is they may be attached to.  They share this information wirelessly (most typically have tiny antennae build into them) with computers, networks and databases.  Multiple RFID tags can be read simultaneously, for fast operation.  A tag could identify a single item, or if applied to a pallet can identify the entire contents of that pallet, or skid, or even a full truckload.

RFID works especially well in high-value, as well as high-volume environments.  It’s great when real-time visibility is crucial.  However, RFID tags are still relatively expensive for tracking inventory.  They generate a lot of data, which can sometimes cause confusion when trying to obtain succinct information.   We’ll continue next post with a comparison to barcode and what makes sense where.  Stay tuned…



Read Full Post »


Today we start a five-part post on data collection and barcode, for those interested in the basic What, Why and How of data collection.

Our friends at Dynamic Manufacturing Solutions (DMS) in Canada, (a provider of add-on products for Microsoft Dynamics NAV ERP systems with whom our firm partners) recently created an informative white paper that nicely highlights some of the opportunities and advantages inherent in the application of “mobile technologies” including barcoding and RFID.  We thought we’d reprise a few highlights for our readers in our next series of posts.

Their white paper, entitled “Keeping the Physical World and Virtual World in Sync: Improving Efficiency with Barcode Technology“ can be downloaded here, by the way.

The whole topic of “data management” has become crucial to business today.  In the manufacturing and distribution environments, data that is well managed can become a key competitive advantage.  Properly implemented, shop floor data collection systems can dramatically improve order accuracy and inventory visibility while reducing shipping and billing errors.  In the long run, companies that make mistakes lose market share, plain and simple.  Automated data collection systems remove this obstacle, when properly implemented.

Our own experience implementing these systems over the past decade or more reinforces this point.  On the other hand, poor data management can result in a host of bad results.  DMS points out a few:

  • Inventory Overstock
  • Expedited Purchases (rushed, last-minute order fulfillment usually in a panic)
  • Lower Than Expected Margins or Lost Receivables
  • Decreased Shop Productivity
  • Increased Office Overhead
  • Poor Customer Service

Shop floor data collection solves these problems with typically rapid ROI and cost recapture.  Today’s systems are relatively inexpensive, very cost effective, and have short payback periods.

But we always caution our clients up front: Can you define exactly WHAT you want from barcode?  Can you define WHERE it will be applied?  Where will it make your operation more efficient?  It becomes critical to implement the system that, as DMS puts it “accurately reflects your business processes to ensure you receive the most from your productivity investment.”

We’ll get into the Hows and Whats starting with our next post.  Stay tuned…


Read Full Post »

A recent article from the December 2010 issue of Business Solutions Magazine (a magazine devoted to “Growth Strategies for the IT Channel”) informs resellers about the latest trends in bar code technology.  A few highlights of interest to those who use bar coding in the warehouse, on the sales floor, or anywhere in between…

Bar code printers have long played a large part in providing cost-effective business controls and improved efficiencies.  Current trends continue to include bar coding as a key technology, driven by customer requirements, 2-D bar code technology and alternate uses of the technology.

Many users have found that direct thermal printers have provided advantages for printing bar code labels over laser and ribbon-based printers, in terms of saving time and money from ribbons, label jams and the like.

Today’s applications often include the need for more variable data being placed into the bar code itself, the ability to encrypt data, and the need for the bar code to last for a longer period of time in some environments and applications. 

One leading label printer manufacturer we often recommend to our clients, Zebra Technologies, sees a trend towards item-level tagging using what is called closed loop RFID applications.  Matching what was ordered to what was received is critical to planning inventory management, but the real benefit they note is the combination of inventory accuracy with item availability on the retail floor. 

As Mike Terzich, Sr. VP of Global Sales for Zebra, notes… “Automatic Identification and Data Capture (AIDC) and RFID have always been about ROI… anytime you see new opportunities for efficiency gains through better asset tracking, you’ll have a nice emerging trend.”

He notes that bar coding has traditionally seen sold on the improvement of inventory management and, by result, cost improvement.  But the ancillary benefit he notes is “the sales lift that stock visibility brings to retailers.  If a customer can’t find the item they’re looking for quickly, that customer will often leave and take that potential sale with them.  This equates to hidden lost revenue.”  RFID and bar coding technologies that allow staff to locate items quickly can prevent this.

Finally, the article notes that bar code printers are becoming ever more versatile with more communications options, simpler user interfaces and easy daily usage.  Programming involving these printers is more interactive than ever, allowing for greater throughput, flexibility and more robust operation and recovery.

Read Full Post »